tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-237107568980307385.post3890469289667048904..comments2023-10-14T12:09:53.706-04:00Comments on WARSKYL: A Page For Christian Martialists: Lines in the Dirt, 2Craig Muttonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09101854366269262430noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-237107568980307385.post-11999247898550054662008-01-15T00:16:00.000-05:002008-01-15T00:16:00.000-05:00Good! You got "discounting the word no", "too many...Good! You got "discounting the word no", "too many details", and forced teaming. I intended one more. Let's see if anyone else gets it.Craig Muttonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09101854366269262430noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-237107568980307385.post-40691037716964566832008-01-14T16:28:00.000-05:002008-01-14T16:28:00.000-05:00Let's see, the most obvious one is "not taking no ...Let's see, the most obvious one is "not taking no for an answer"; he also could be considered to give "too many details", and I can't remember the succinct phrase for this, but he forces an 'us' view of the situation by implying common ground. Did I miss any?Raquelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00361888260081584784noreply@blogger.com